Editorial question. The mayor proposes the Town budget under the strong-mayor process; council has statutory amendment powers. County and education portions are separate. Read the issue and its sources: /tillsonburg/issues/tillsonburg-budget-choices
Responses on the record
Public statement
Deb Gilvesy
Response received; assessment pending
This response has not yet been assessed against every part of the specific question.
Below-inflation target; prioritize essential services and asset renewal.
Action: Find efficiencies and prioritize essential services and asset renewal.
Timing: 2027 budget.
Read the supporting public source
Statement date 2026-09-09
Public statement
Kelly Spencer
Response received; assessment pending
This response has not yet been assessed against every part of the specific question.
Cost-of-living ceiling; review spending before setting increases.
Read the supporting public source
Statement date 2026-09-09
Public statement
Dave Beres
Response received; assessment pending
This response has not yet been assessed against every part of the specific question.
Keep residential increases within inflation; preserve services.
Read the supporting public source
Statement date 2026-09-09
Public statement
Lindsey Ambrus Mejaski
Response received; assessment pending
This response has not yet been assessed against every part of the specific question.
Target zero increase; prioritize emergency services.
Read the supporting public source
Statement date 2026-09-09
Public statement
Ron Gasparetto
Response received; assessment pending
This response has not yet been assessed against every part of the specific question.
Prefer at most 3%; protect necessary infrastructure and services.
Read the supporting public source
Statement date 2026-09-09
Public statement
Chrissy Rosehart
Response received; assessment pending
This response has not yet been assessed against every part of the specific question.
Aim around 3%; preserve infrastructure and greenspace.
Read the supporting public source
Statement date 2026-09-09
Public statement
Deanna (Dee) Tosto
Response received; assessment pending
This response has not yet been assessed against every part of the specific question.
Target 2–3% tied to explained service needs.
Read the supporting public source
Statement date 2026-09-09
Public statement
Katherine Englander
Response received; assessment pending
This response has not yet been assessed against every part of the specific question.
Target no more than 3%, where feasible.
Action: Require justification above that target.
Read the supporting public source
Statement date 2026-09-09
Public statement
Christopher (Chris) Parker
Response received; assessment pending
This response has not yet been assessed against every part of the specific question.
Target 2–2.5%; pursue grants and efficiencies.
Read the supporting public source
Statement date 2026-09-09
Public statement
Felix Nonso Nzemeka
Response received; assessment pending
This response has not yet been assessed against every part of the specific question.
Target zero municipal increase while protecting essential services.
Read the supporting public source
Statement date 2026-09-09
Public statement
Kim Sage
Response received; assessment pending
This response has not yet been assessed against every part of the specific question.
No firm target before financial review; ideally zero or lower.
Read the supporting public source
Statement date 2026-09-09
Public statement
Stephen Molnar
Response received; assessment pending
This response has not yet been assessed against every part of the specific question.
Follow community strategic priorities; balance taxation against value.
Read the supporting public source
Statement date 2026-09-09
Public statement
John Gilvesy
Response received; assessment pending
This response has not yet been assessed against every part of the specific question.
Tentatively inflation; review department recommendations before deciding.
Read the supporting public source
Statement date 2026-09-09